Apr 23, 2011
Apr 22, 2011
Apr 18, 2011
Wake up.
01010100011010000110010100100000011000110110000101101011011001010 01000000110100101110011001000000110000100100000011011000110100101 10010100101110001000000101001001100101011000100110010101101100001 01100001000000111100101101111011101010010000001101101011101010111 00110111010000100000011101000111010101110010011011100010000001100 00101100111011000010110100101101110011100110111010000100000011010 00011001010111001000101110001000000101011101100001011010110110010 10010000001110101011100000010000100100000010100100100010101000010 010001010100110000100001
Apr 17, 2011
Portal 2: more than Portal 2
This thread showed up on the Portal 2 section of the Steam forums today. Something big is going to happen in the game, and I'll bet you a golden crowbar it has everything to do with Half-Life.
EDIT: this ominous message probably has more to do with the fact that a couple of console versions have been leaked and made available on torrent sites. I am, however, standing by my prognostication.
Mind = blown
FilePlanet has a 1080p version the full BF3 trailer available for download here.
You must do this. The difference is substantial.
You must do this. The difference is substantial.
Apr 16, 2011
BF3: the full 12-minute trailer
You've seen a lot of this already, but the complete package is a triumph:
Geforce.com published an interview with BF3's executive producer, Patrick Bach, a couple of days ago. The whole thing is worth reading, but this is inarguably the money quote:
[Q] Do you feel the consoles are holding PC games back?
[A] Yes, absolutely. That's the biggest problem we have today. Most games are actually still based on the same core idea that the consoles are your focus, the superior platform or something. I don’t know why. That was the truth 5 years ago, but the world has moved on. PCs are way more powerful than the consoles today and there are actually almost zero games out there that actually use the benefits of this. So for our target of what we want to hit, we are now using the more powerful platform to try and prove what we see gaming being in the future rather than using the lowest common denominator, instead of developing it for the consoles and then just adding higher resolution textures and anti-aliasing for the PC version. We're do it the other way around, we start with the highest-end technology that we can come up with and then scale it back to the consoles.So it seems I was right. Welcome to the revolution.
WOW That's BIG!
So after everyone was giving me crap about my hair being gay, I tweaked my avatar. Somehow, during the photo taking step I broke his neck. His head won't go up much more than this anymore.So, I submitted it as a bug report and asked why my character must stare at his penis all day.
Apr 13, 2011
Apr 12, 2011
The Top 5 Reasons Brink Could Be Great
Note: the information in this article was compiled from the following sources: fragworld, x360magazine, the Escapist, co-optimus, and the Brink wikia. All information found on the internet is absolutely true.
1. There is no "KDR" in "TEAM"
The Kill-to-Death Ratio has become a blight on multiplayer shooters. Tracking it institutionalizes selfishness, inviting players to maximize personal stats while being mostly useless. The few games that have avoided this innanity (i.e.: L4D1 &; 2) have made "killing the bad guys" a compenent of teamwork, rather than a separate goal unto itself.
Brink will be the third MP shooter of this generation to buck the KDR-whoring trend. The game's leaderboards will not track run-of-the-mill murder. Players will get experience points for solo kills, but that XP reward will be tiny compared to the outlay for more team-oriented actions. For example, while a player may earn around 25 XP for a kill, the same player might grab ten times that number for blowing up a door that's blocking a sneaky access point into the next zone. The XP reward for a kill will be multiplied in some circumstances – as in the case of dropping an enemy near a core objective – but capping objectives, setting up defenses, and healing teammates are all higher-value endeavors.
2. Nonetheless, combat is king
While a player so inclined can operate effectively without ever firing a shot, the warfighters in the game will have have the tools to wreak havok. Objectives need to be assaulted and defended, and Splash Damage wants the resulting mayhem to be art in motion. Edward Stern, Brink's lead writer, had this to say about the combat:
All weapons are theoretically available to all classes, but in addition to selecting your class, you'll also be selecting your body type (light, medium, or heavy) once you've gained enough XP. Heavies will have more health, and will be able to wield the biggest weapons, but they'll be slower and less nimble. The lightweights will navigate to cover and through flanking routes more quickly, and will get the full effect of the SMART movement system. If it all works out, players will have to adjust their combat tactics on the fly, and no one will have an inherent advantage just because he has more gear unlocked.
3. Shaving the Wookies
In addition to marginalizing kill-counts, Splash Damage has devised other ways diminish the returns on the point-and-click adventure game tactics that snipers love so much. Although there will be high-damage rifles that can be fitted with scopes, the developers say they've been careful not to create any superweapons. Nothing will drop a medium or heavy player with a single body shot, and light bodies will be tough to hit if they're doing it right.
Splash Damage wants to create more "intimate" combat experiences, and that means keeping your crosshair on-target for more than half a second, while both you and your opponent are moving. There's no word yet on whether headshots are insta-kills with some weapons, but with a game that's 8v8 max, and that allows sneaky flankers to vault over barriers that would be impassible in other games, there shouldn't be many opportunities to wait around for a certain subset of enemies to funnel into scope.
4. Melee is not > bullets
Brink has a knife attack, but the knife can only be equipped offhand when you're using a pistol. For all other weapons, the melee attack comes from the butt of the gun. Slashing, stabbing, and bashing will only insta-kill a lightweight character with no health buff equipped. Everyone else has to be softened up first.
That's what melee should be: an attack of last resort when things get truly hairy, or a finishing move to amplify the humiliation when you've already won the fight.
5. MP within the campaign
Brink is always 8v8, whether you have one human player or 16. You can solo offline with 15 bots in the mix. Online, you can co-op with up to seven friends against an all-bot team, or play against real, human players. No matter how you do it, the story arc advances as you play.
The game actually offers two campaigns: one for each faction. As either the Security forces or members of the Resistance, playing a round has implications in the larger narrative – a script without scripting – and that's something that few multiplayer games have done outside the MMO space. Given that Brink wants to make its bones as a shooter, we might finally have a game that evolves the genre past the desperately tired formula in which SP, MP, and co-op are all discrete units.
Brink's goal is to bridge those (artificial) gaps, allowing player vs. player combat to occur in a context that's deeper than "Americans vs. [insert name here]." Borderlands and Left 4 Dead did that to a degree, but their respective plots were rather thin. Hopefully, Brink will go whole-hog in characterizing the factions beyond just Red vs. Blue. The broader and deeper the story, the better. None of us need much motivation to shoot people in the face, but having more and different motivations to shoot people in the face could elevate this game.
EDIT: Brink's system specs are here.
1. There is no "KDR" in "TEAM"
The Kill-to-Death Ratio has become a blight on multiplayer shooters. Tracking it institutionalizes selfishness, inviting players to maximize personal stats while being mostly useless. The few games that have avoided this innanity (i.e.: L4D1 &; 2) have made "killing the bad guys" a compenent of teamwork, rather than a separate goal unto itself.
Brink will be the third MP shooter of this generation to buck the KDR-whoring trend. The game's leaderboards will not track run-of-the-mill murder. Players will get experience points for solo kills, but that XP reward will be tiny compared to the outlay for more team-oriented actions. For example, while a player may earn around 25 XP for a kill, the same player might grab ten times that number for blowing up a door that's blocking a sneaky access point into the next zone. The XP reward for a kill will be multiplied in some circumstances – as in the case of dropping an enemy near a core objective – but capping objectives, setting up defenses, and healing teammates are all higher-value endeavors.
2. Nonetheless, combat is king
While a player so inclined can operate effectively without ever firing a shot, the warfighters in the game will have have the tools to wreak havok. Objectives need to be assaulted and defended, and Splash Damage wants the resulting mayhem to be art in motion. Edward Stern, Brink's lead writer, had this to say about the combat:
We're trying to get rid of no-skill kills. No air strikes. No grenade spam, all the grenades are on a cooldown. Also, grenades are assist weapons, not kill weapons. They knock you down and make you vulnerable but they don't do that much damage.(Note: grenades will explode when shot, and none of the trailers have shown high-velocity launchers. It's possible that there's no TUNA – i.e.: Totally Unavoidable Noob Artillery – in this game.)
All weapons are theoretically available to all classes, but in addition to selecting your class, you'll also be selecting your body type (light, medium, or heavy) once you've gained enough XP. Heavies will have more health, and will be able to wield the biggest weapons, but they'll be slower and less nimble. The lightweights will navigate to cover and through flanking routes more quickly, and will get the full effect of the SMART movement system. If it all works out, players will have to adjust their combat tactics on the fly, and no one will have an inherent advantage just because he has more gear unlocked.
3. Shaving the Wookies
In addition to marginalizing kill-counts, Splash Damage has devised other ways diminish the returns on the point-and-click adventure game tactics that snipers love so much. Although there will be high-damage rifles that can be fitted with scopes, the developers say they've been careful not to create any superweapons. Nothing will drop a medium or heavy player with a single body shot, and light bodies will be tough to hit if they're doing it right.
Splash Damage wants to create more "intimate" combat experiences, and that means keeping your crosshair on-target for more than half a second, while both you and your opponent are moving. There's no word yet on whether headshots are insta-kills with some weapons, but with a game that's 8v8 max, and that allows sneaky flankers to vault over barriers that would be impassible in other games, there shouldn't be many opportunities to wait around for a certain subset of enemies to funnel into scope.
4. Melee is not > bullets
Brink has a knife attack, but the knife can only be equipped offhand when you're using a pistol. For all other weapons, the melee attack comes from the butt of the gun. Slashing, stabbing, and bashing will only insta-kill a lightweight character with no health buff equipped. Everyone else has to be softened up first.
That's what melee should be: an attack of last resort when things get truly hairy, or a finishing move to amplify the humiliation when you've already won the fight.
5. MP within the campaign
Brink is always 8v8, whether you have one human player or 16. You can solo offline with 15 bots in the mix. Online, you can co-op with up to seven friends against an all-bot team, or play against real, human players. No matter how you do it, the story arc advances as you play.
The game actually offers two campaigns: one for each faction. As either the Security forces or members of the Resistance, playing a round has implications in the larger narrative – a script without scripting – and that's something that few multiplayer games have done outside the MMO space. Given that Brink wants to make its bones as a shooter, we might finally have a game that evolves the genre past the desperately tired formula in which SP, MP, and co-op are all discrete units.
Brink's goal is to bridge those (artificial) gaps, allowing player vs. player combat to occur in a context that's deeper than "Americans vs. [insert name here]." Borderlands and Left 4 Dead did that to a degree, but their respective plots were rather thin. Hopefully, Brink will go whole-hog in characterizing the factions beyond just Red vs. Blue. The broader and deeper the story, the better. None of us need much motivation to shoot people in the face, but having more and different motivations to shoot people in the face could elevate this game.
EDIT: Brink's system specs are here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)