You'll be tempted to skip ahead. Don't.
Apr 20, 2009
Apr 17, 2009
3:12 to Yuma, if Yuma is freakin' hell
Blog posts aren't supposed to make you crap your pants, but this one from the L4D blog will turn your bowels to water. The whole thing is well-worth reading, but for the attention deficit monkeys, there's one sentence that tells you everything you need to know:
Consider that last night, Frisky, Bone and I dropped just over 2400 on "No Mercy"/advanced in about 75 minutes. A round of L4D's survival mode is designed to last about 10 minutes.
10 minutes my ass.
The post is accompanied by an informative graph, which provides some nasty insights:
(click to enlarge)
The red curve is brutal. The way I read it, at about the 3:12 mark, a Boomer, Hunter, or Smoker is going to spawn in every 4 to 5 seconds. At that point, you'll have already faced 4 or 5 horde rushes and 2 tanks, in addition to all the specials wandering in at extremely regular intervals. And Valve haven't mentioned yet whether we'll find any witches in the arena. Dirty.
Extremely regular. Is that like extra-medium?
Given the extreme pace of Survival Mode, the number of zombies killed in a single round often outnumbers an entire campaign.
Consider that last night, Frisky, Bone and I dropped just over 2400 on "No Mercy"/advanced in about 75 minutes. A round of L4D's survival mode is designed to last about 10 minutes.
10 minutes my ass.
The post is accompanied by an informative graph, which provides some nasty insights:
The red curve is brutal. The way I read it, at about the 3:12 mark, a Boomer, Hunter, or Smoker is going to spawn in every 4 to 5 seconds. At that point, you'll have already faced 4 or 5 horde rushes and 2 tanks, in addition to all the specials wandering in at extremely regular intervals. And Valve haven't mentioned yet whether we'll find any witches in the arena. Dirty.
Extremely regular. Is that like extra-medium?
Three down, a billion to go
Meanwhile, Stagnetti has his revenge: Stardock's Demigod has around 140,000 users three days after release, but avast! ... about 120,000 of them didn't pay for the game [4]. The other 20,000 are getting screwed with connection problems, of course, having to compete for database resources with all the bastard buccaneers [5].
Apr 16, 2009
Quickie link
If you're interested in Operation Flashpoint: Dragon Rising, you'll definitely want to check this out.
How to be a jackass in L4D
(Part I of MXXXIII)
1. Throw a Molotov at The Tank in a narrow corridor, leaving one teammate on the other side.
2. Miss The Tank completely.
3. Wait for the flames to die down while The Tank is boning the lone teammate on the other side.
4. If the lone teammate survives, don't heal him, even if you're the only one with a health pack.
If you followed these instructions, congratulations! I hate you.
1. Throw a Molotov at The Tank in a narrow corridor, leaving one teammate on the other side.
2. Miss The Tank completely.
3. Wait for the flames to die down while The Tank is boning the lone teammate on the other side.
4. If the lone teammate survives, don't heal him, even if you're the only one with a health pack.
If you followed these instructions, congratulations! I hate you.
Apr 15, 2009
More on Six Days
From Nick Breckon at Shack News:
I've recently come to the (tentative) conclusion that Atomic's claims to authenticity are, for the most part, a defensive contrivance. There are good reasons to doubt that their intent from the beginning was "to create the most realistic military shooter possible." Rather, I think it's more likely that the "authenticity" argument came after the criticism started (or was anticipated).
If I'm right about that, it was a pretty stupid decision to go this route. It's not just that Atomic is making extravagant promises about Six Days in Fallujah that they obviously aren't going to be able to keep. They also seem rather eager to pimp the controversy as a marketing tool, which is more evidence of their tone deafness.
I can't see this ending well.
Immediately it was apparent that Six Days is not aiming for a very realistic take on modern warfare. I never did imagine that Atomic would create a plodding, Operation Flashpoint-esque shooter in the sacrifice of action-packed combat. But considering the extensive marketing on the point of realism, I certainly didn't expect to see soldiers running out into the middle of the street during a firefight, taking a half-dozen bullets in the chest, and then regenerating their health safely behind cover. Not in a planned demonstration for press, at least.
I've recently come to the (tentative) conclusion that Atomic's claims to authenticity are, for the most part, a defensive contrivance. There are good reasons to doubt that their intent from the beginning was "to create the most realistic military shooter possible." Rather, I think it's more likely that the "authenticity" argument came after the criticism started (or was anticipated).
If I'm right about that, it was a pretty stupid decision to go this route. It's not just that Atomic is making extravagant promises about Six Days in Fallujah that they obviously aren't going to be able to keep. They also seem rather eager to pimp the controversy as a marketing tool, which is more evidence of their tone deafness.
I can't see this ending well.
Apr 13, 2009
She's frigid, but not in a bad way
Thus far, Cryostasis: Sleep of Reason has been completely off IUN's FPS radar. But since the game is due for release in the US on Wednesday (April 15), it's probably time to stop ignoring it.
If you're looking for a new single-player experience to pass the time, Cryostasis might be worth a look for it's fairly unique concept. One caveat: the game apparently has no multi-core support, which may be a real problem considering it's supposed to be the first showcase for Nvidia's PhysX real-time water physics (tech demo immediately below).
We also have a game play video for you, which is actually the third of three:
If you're looking for a new single-player experience to pass the time, Cryostasis might be worth a look for it's fairly unique concept. One caveat: the game apparently has no multi-core support, which may be a real problem considering it's supposed to be the first showcase for Nvidia's PhysX real-time water physics (tech demo immediately below).
We also have a game play video for you, which is actually the third of three:
Apr 12, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)