It's time we talked about this

As reported here and just about everywhere else, several thousands of people have pledged to boycott Valve's Left 4 Dead 2, which is due for release in November. The boycotter's manifesto is available here, but distilled to its essence, it consists of a demand that they get all the new content for free. Failing that, of course, they want it at a reduced price. Under no circumstances – so the story goes – will they pay full price for the sequel to a game they've deemed unfinished.

To be fair, there is an argument to be made that releasing a sequel only a year after the first game is very un-Valve-like. TF2 has seen several content updates since the game's release in 2007 (with more on the way), and L4D(1) players got a large upgrade in the form of the "Survival Pack" a few months back (again, with more on the way). And that's to say nothing of the continuous and frequent patching of every major title in Valve's stable. All of that has traditionally come gratis to those who bought the original games.

And that has left some with a sense of entitlement.

Although it contains the caveat that "[j]udgment cannot be passed on the quality of Left 4 Dead 2 until its release," the manifesto goes on to assert that the "announced content of Left 4 Dead 2 does not warrant a stand-alone, full-priced sequel[.]" Restated, the argument is that four new characters, 20 new weapons, new zombies (with revamped kill mechanics for the old ones), a new Director, and five new campaigns (that's 25 maps, BTW) – among other things – does not a sequel make.

Taken in isolation, that argument is pretty stupid. In an industry where the prevalent formula is core gameplay + facelift = sequel, L4D2 is entirely unremarkable. For those who've claimed that all the additional stuff was easy for Valve to create (thus devaluing the effort), I invite them to make one map in Hammer that's not only functional – in campaign, versus, and survival modes – but also has the quality and balance of any one of the stock L4D maps. Make sure you keep track of your time, so you can multiply the final tally by a factor of 25. If you prefer, you can pay someone else to do it … at an hourly rate typical for the industry. Times 25.

The aforementioned absurdity is, however, layered beneath what I take to be the main, mostly unspoken argument: that L4D(1) doesn't have enough to it to be considered a "full" game. In other words, a series of free content updates – ala TF2 – is necessary to justify the initial $50 outlay. My response to that is this: I've logged over 92 hours in the game since I bought it, which works out to about 54 cents per hour for my investment. I only play the game occasionally, and only with a handful of friends, and I am quite certain that many of the boycotters have played L4D far more than I have. If you still feel you're not getting enough bang for your buck, try going to 92 hours worth of movies, and check your wallet when you're done.

It would be entirely reasonable to argue that the rabid loyalty of Valve's fan base is an indispensible component of Valve's success, so their gripes should be taken seriously. The inverse, however, is also true: the fan base has been that loyal because Valve has been that good through the years. On balance, Valve is entitled to the benefit of the doubt.

Being spoiled does not entitle us to behave that way.

ADDENDUM: I forgot to mention that none of the boycotters responsible for (or supportive of) the video up top seem to realize that they've cast themselves as the nazis. Apparently, a sense of irony is not a prerequisite to joining that Steam Group.